|
Transport expenditures
- reviewing optimization, cost savings,
and how to create a robust transportation network
A majority of shippers have not made much progress in terms
of optimization, cost savings, and creating a robust transportation
network in which suppliers, carriers, and third party providers
can all collaborate and share information to ensure the optimal
balance between cost and service. (6/25/2003)
Transportation expenditures, traditionally are very reactive,
and are a side affect to poor management of upstream business
functions, especially production planning and procurement.
Traditionally, those who procure transportation are under
the illusion that squeezing a few more discount points from
their carriers for a few pennies here and there are the ways
that a company can ultimately lower transportation expenditures.
While many spend time attempting this form of cost savings,
true efficiency resides elsewhere.
The only way to truly optimize a transportation network is
to take transportation and logistics costs, and build them
into the costs of materials being shipped, and to evaluate
materials planning and purchasing on a total landed cost basis.
This will force firms to consider equipment optimization,
much more collaborative carrier relationships, and the elimination
of process disconnects between transportation and planning/purchasing.
Moreover, multi-million dollar ERP systems are widely available
to assist companies in these efforts. Worldwide companies
have spent hundreds of millions implementing and attempting
to use such systems. Very few companies have been able to
prove they can use these systems as they were intended. This
is hugely because the companies with the money to buy such
systems are so large, they are unwilling to re-engineer business
processes to get the best performance out of their software
investments.
So what's the answer?
If most firms cannot find the ultimate in transportation efficiency,
how can they improve their networks to improve their position
in the marketplace, as well as the bottom line? Hence, it
may make sense to outsource. Firms leave the transportation
and logistics to the transportation and logistics companies.
They key there is to pick the right one. Volumes have been
written about how to effectively select a third party provider,
consultants have made millions by managing the selection process.
No single firm could understand the logistics chain of every
possible company or network of companies. The answer is not
found in the large, most commonly known 3PL's. They speak
of expertise and technology, but ultimately try to be all
things to all clients. These firms, such as Ryder, Penske,
UPS Logistics Group, and Menlo can be effective only when
the transportation needs of their clients are extremely simple.
The entities that understand your business the best is the
small or mid-size 3PL's that have industry specific expertise
and knowledge of the business arena in which they operate.
Healthcare, Chemicals, Automotive, etc. have 3PL's that are
well versed in the ways to totally optimize the transportation
network.
Proven, efficient operations and logistics management, accented
by the right software solutions is the right way to achieve
transportation efficiency. Industry specific third-party providers
are those that understand the logistics chain the better than
all others. Their niche approach and expertise in their industry
and the transportation processes that are necessary allow
these companies to continually expand their knowledge base.
They will know more than any single shipper because they work
with a cross section of companies and a much larger network
of carriers. Their experience is vast in both quality and
quantity. These are the firms who understand the true cost
dynamics of transportation efficiency. Companies who have
not had successful 3PL relationships have failed in their
selection process. Companies who have unsuccessful internal
operations have failed to recognize the effectiveness and
bottom-line efficiency available to them by engaging in the
right third-party relationship. |